On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Just van Rossum wrote: >But the *reason* for this proposal is to turn this idiom: > > for i in range(len(seq)): > element = seq[i] > ... > >into this: > > for i, element in enumerate(seq): > ... > >It's hardly useful for types that don't have numeric indices, so the fact that >it _does_ work with any iterator seems almost an implementation detail. > >I quite like the name enumerate. Hate itercount. I'm neutral on indexed. Pardon me if I'm daft, but... What was wrong with seq.items() / seq.iteritems(), that they dropped out of the discussion ? /Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4