Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> writes:
> On 25 Mar 2002, Michael Hudson wrote:
>
> > Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> writes:
>
> {...}
>
> > > Sorry, I've not had time to look at this for the OS/2-EMX build; maybe
> > > tonight.
> >
> > I thought OS/2-EMX was only going to be supported in 2.3? I'm
> > certainly not going to port all those checkins you made to the -maint
> > branch.
>
> I wasn't expecting them to be backported, and I don't expect the release
> sourceball to contain the OS/2 EMX changes until 2.3 either.
Good.
> I do however plan a binary release of 2.2.1 from my local CVS. If there
> were any problems apparently not related specifically to my OS/2 patches,
> I'd let you know.
It's getting kind of late for these to make any difference...
> In particular the test_math run you requested feedback about (as a
> datapoint, not something you could/should resolve).
Again, good (the me not having to do anythign part :).
> As I've had system problems, and am not sure whether I've got my local
> vendor-branch 2.2 CVS tree straightened out after importing 2.2C1, I
> haven't had anything to report :-(
Well, OK, it would be nice to have, but don't push yourself about
it...
Cheers,
M.
--
Monte Carlo sampling is no way to understand code.
-- Gordon McMillan, comp.lang.python
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4