Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> > > Bugfix candidate (but I think it's too late for 2.2.1).
> >
> > Because ...? The 2.2.1c2 Windows installer won't get built today,
> > and the tarball won't get cut at least until Michael has another cut
> > at the NEWS file. So it's not too late to put it into 2.2.1 if you
> > feel confident about this change.
>
> Because Michael said "no more checkins". He's also gone to bed,
I've gotten up again now.
> I trust, and I don't feel like overriding him without talking to him
> first. Maybe he'll be happy to add this to the branch in the
> morning.
It looks harmless enough, it's in.
Skip wrote:
> There's always a third possibility: 2.2.1c3, but I would assume
> that's mostly Michael's call.
Will all due repect, NFW[0].
Cheers,
M.
[0] If it helps to work this acronym out, the middle word is rude.
--
ARTHUR: Why are there three of you?
LINTILLAS: Why is there only one of you?
ARTHUR: Er... Could I have notice of that question?
-- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 11
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4