[Barry A. Warsaw] > I think Jeremy has a good point here. IME, logging itself is > unnecessary for for many Python programs, be they library modules or > simple scripts. It seems that having a logger module *at all* is a YAGNI for 99% of users 99% of the time. That suggests that, if it's a good idea to have one anyway, it should cater to the 1% of users who need it 1% of the time. This makes me uncomfortable about rejecting requirements from people who actually use logging heavily. Else we're going to reinvent parsermodule: all the basic pieces appear to be there, and only someone who actually needs its facilities will find out they've got to write a ton of stuff on top of it before getting something truly usable.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4