Trent Mick wrote:
>Kevin, which side are you advocating here?
>Definitions:
> 'AGAINST' means to NOT provide the ability to log exceptions at levels
> other than ERROR
> 'FOR' means that that functionality SHOULD be provided.
>
Sorry for the confusion. I am FOR the functionality, because the code
I've written & maintained has
needed it.
Although I like simplicity and thus empathize with Guido's desire to
simplify via YAGNI
("Done is better than perfect, simple is better than creative"), I
believe failure to provide the
functionality provides only a small simplification but will result in
too many distinct
reimplementations of the functionality and/or too much cluttered logging.
Guess-the-chad-was-dimpled-ly y'rs,
kb
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4