[Guido van Rossum wrote] > > [Jeremy Hylton wrote] > > > It seems quite plausible to decide to log an exception and > > > then get another trivial exception raised and caught on the > > > way to the logger. You would still want to log the original > > > exception, so passing it explicitly is helpful sometimes. > > [Trent] > > Yes, I suppose so. > > I'd like to call YAGNI on this. Also on the idea of being able to > pass an exception to all logging levels. Also on the idea of passing > the exc_info in rather than having the logger call sys.exc_info(). > > Instead, the logger should be subclassable or extensible so that > Jeremy can implement this functionality if he really wants it. > > KISS. Alrigtie. Trent -- Trent Mick TrentM@ActiveState.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4