Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/021457.html below:

[Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[Fredrik Lundh]
> ...
> I've fixed the "incorrect usage" for PIL 1.1.4.  just some
> 100 more modules to fix...

I'd hold off on this, under the theory that we can't actually get away with
breaking 100s of modules.  Is all your "breakage" of the form PyObject_NEW +
PyMem_DEL?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4