A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/021452.html below:

[Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?

[Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation? [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?Skip Montanaro skip@pobox.com
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:27:08 -0600
    Michael> I thought we'd already worked this much out...

    Skip> We might have, but clearly there are a lot of extension module
    Skip> writers who haven't. ;-)

    Fredrik> yeah, blame it on the extension writers.  we should have known
    Fredrik> that we couldn't trust the documentation and the code samples
    Fredrik> shipped with Python...

I wasn't blaming anything on the extension writers.  As an example,
mysql-python is actively maintained and enhanced, but still uses the 1.5.2
API.  I don't blame Andy for not having discovered and reacted to this API
change.  I was merely commenting that there are a lot of extensions that for
whatever reason don't play by the current rules.  That the rules changed in
subtle ways since 1.5.2 is not the extension writers' fault.

Skip



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4