A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/021447.html below:

[Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?

[Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation? [Python-Dev] pymalloc API - is 1.5.2 compatibility a possible explanation?Skip Montanaro skip@pobox.com
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:33:06 -0600
    Michael> Better IMHO is what _sre.c does:

    Michael> #if PY_VERSION_HEX < 0x01060000
    Michael> #define PyObject_DEL(op) PyMem_DEL((op))
    Michael> #endif

Thanks, I'll pass that along to Andy.

    >> It would appear at least some of the breakage stems from actual or
    >> perceived differences in the object allocation API between 1.5.2 and
    >> 2.x.

    Michael> I thought we'd already worked this much out...

We might have, but clearly there are a lot of extension module writers who
haven't. ;-)

Skip



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4