On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:27:46 -0500 Neal Norwitz <neal@metaslash.com> wrote: > > On the other hand, I plan to work on a new AST for the > > compiler builtin to the interpreter. I expect it will > be > > quite similar to the compiler package's AST, but > perhaps not > > exactly the same. It might be better if CPython and > Jython > > standardized an AST as part of the 2.3 development > cycle. > > Then pychecker2 could use it. > > I think this is a great idea! Let me know if I can help. 'twould be much appreciated. I wonder if the Powers That Be might consider reviving the compiler sig. There's a lot of detailed discussion to have, and I'm not sure python-dev is the right place. I could post a short summary of action items for 2.3 development on this list, but I'd rather see detailed discussion elsewhere. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4