A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/021129.html below:

[Python-Dev] Next version of PEP278 - universal newline support

[Python-Dev] Next version of PEP278 - universal newline support - availableSamuele Pedroni pedroni@inf.ethz.ch
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:50:38 +0100
From: Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
> 
>     Skip> Pass this off to PyChecker?
> 
>     Samuele> Anyway as long as PyChecker does not work with Jython and is
>     Samuele> not part of the official distribution, IMO, I would be more
>     Samuele> critical about what kind of critical code breakage should be
>     Samuele> dectected by Python and what by PyChecker
> 
> Take a look at the PyChecker website:
> 
>     https://sourceforge.net/projects/pychecker/
> 
> If you check out the PyChecker code, you also get a pychecker2 directory.
> My understanding is that it works from Python source, not bytecode, the
> intent being that it should eventually work with Jython.
> 

Glad of this. But anyway is a long road from here.
It seems that PyChecker2 code is ~10 days old.
I have not seen any explicit statement about Jython
and until Jython 2.2 is out there is no support
for the needed subset of Lib/compiler on our side.

Of course this approach is easier to support
for Jython.

And, no, I'm not informed of everything that happens
in Python-land, I have not seen any announcement
about PyChecker2 here or on comp.lang.python,
or on jython's lists.

regards.

 




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4