A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/021104.html below:

[Python-Dev] Next version of PEP278 - universal newline support

[Python-Dev] Next version of PEP278 - universal newline support - availableAndy Gimblett gimbo@ftech.net
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:53:38 +0000
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:46:43AM -0500, Paul Svensson wrote:

> No, you're not the only one.
> Of course, this will break some unix code where the author forgot to add
> a "b" when opening a binary file, but I'd say they deserve to lose.

Forgive my ignorance, but why?  I'm not trying to be provocative,
that's a serious question from someone who thought that as far as unix
was concerned, a file consists of bytes and "that's that".  So I'd be
interested to know, what are the negative implications of such an
omission?

Thanks,

Andy

-- 
Andy Gimblett - Programmer - Frontier Internet Services Limited
Tel: 029 20 820 044 Fax: 029 20 820 035 http://www.frontier.net.uk/
Statements made are at all times subject to Frontier's Terms and
Conditions of Business, which are available upon request.



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4