"Martin v. Loewis" wrote: > > I just performed some benchmark of pymalloc, compared to glibc 2.2 > malloc, using xmlproc (a pure-Python XML parser) as the sample > application. On an artificial input document, the standard > configuration ran 16.3s; the configuration with pymalloc ran 15s. > > I recommend to enable pymalloc by default; I can commit the necessary > changes if desired. AFAIK, pymalloc still has problems with threading, so I unless this has already been resolved, I don't think it's a good idea to enable it by default just yet (since threads are enabled per default too). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4