aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
> Figured this should be moved.
Probably right. Slightly surprisingly, there doesn't seem to be a
sf support request on this issue -- maybe it's just us?
I'll file one... here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=529477&group_id=1&atid=200001
Cheers,
M.
> ------- start of forwarded message -------
> Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
> From: Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net>
> Subject: Re: zlib vulnerabilities and python
> Message-ID: <u8z8wsey5.fsf@python.net>
> References: <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <a6nnsg$chc$1@panix1.panix.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:43:13 GMT
>
> aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>
> > In article <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>,
> > Robin Becker <robin@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>Does the recent zlib double free vulnerability
> >>http://news.com.com/2100-1001-857008.html
> >>impact zlib.pyd?
> >
> > Dunno, but I filed a SF bug to check compatibility with the new 1.1.4.
>
> But because mail from the sf tracker seems to be hitting the bit
> bucket, noone knows about this.
>
> Time to look at roundup again? The tracker on sf is starting to piss
> me off (even more).
>
> Cheers,
> M.
>
> --
> We've had a lot of problems going from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1.
> People claim binary compatibility. Except for functions they
> don't like. -- Peter Van Eynde, comp.lang.lisp
> ------- end of forwarded message -------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>
--
42. You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his
attitude on the continuing vitality of FORTRAN.
-- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4