Figured this should be moved. ------- start of forwarded message ------- Newsgroups: comp.lang.python From: Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net> Subject: Re: zlib vulnerabilities and python Message-ID: <u8z8wsey5.fsf@python.net> References: <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <a6nnsg$chc$1@panix1.panix.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:43:13 GMT aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes: > In article <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>, > Robin Becker <robin@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >> >>Does the recent zlib double free vulnerability >>http://news.com.com/2100-1001-857008.html >>impact zlib.pyd? > > Dunno, but I filed a SF bug to check compatibility with the new 1.1.4. But because mail from the sf tracker seems to be hitting the bit bucket, noone knows about this. Time to look at roundup again? The tracker on sf is starting to piss me off (even more). Cheers, M. -- We've had a lot of problems going from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1. People claim binary compatibility. Except for functions they don't like. -- Peter Van Eynde, comp.lang.lisp ------- end of forwarded message -------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4