David> Pretty FUD-ly, Guido! That problem only happens to people that David> don't really understand const and its implications. If you David> leave the job in the hands of someone who's used const David> extensively there's no reason it should cause serious problems. I think Guido is correct to the extent that it is a real nuisance to retrofit const to a substantial program that was written without using it in the first place. I think Dave is correct to the extent that adding const to the parameters of a collection of library functions rarely causes trouble for users of that library. -- Andrew Koenig, ark@research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4