Tim Peters wrote: > > [Greg Ewing] > > The fact that they use a notation for that at all suggests > > that even they didn't go so far as to regard booleans as > > *identical* to integers. > > Of course. But if Knuth continues growing more sensible over the years, in > about a decade he'll rediscover APL <wink>. I'll just thread as: "Booleans as a subtype of integers enables APL-style programming." <0.3 wink> Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4