Greg Ewing <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> writes: > Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>: > > > Guido's proposal is for bool to be a > > subclass of int. Consequently, 28 + True should yield 29 > > But True - 1 won't equal False. Should it? Despite that Guido said "no" here, I think the answer is "yes", and the first sentence is wrong: True - 1 == False. True - 1 won't be identical with False, but it will be equal to it. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4