>>>>> "JO" == Jason Orendorff <jason@jorendorff.com> writes:
JO> Indeed! But this is another argument in favor of "true" and
JO> "false", of course, because all Modula-2's keywords are
JO> UPPERCASE and all Python's keywords are lowercase.
I've mostly tuned this thread out since I'm confident Guido will DTRT,
but in case I've missed something, we aren't talking about making
"true" and "false" (regardless of spelling) keywords, are we?
/me checks the PEP
Nope, and that's a very good thing, otherwise much code breakage will
ensue.
In any event, I'm sure Guido's heard all the arguments by now and has
made up his mind about this particular issue. For my money, True and
False are just fine since they're singled objects sitting in builtins
just like None and Ellipsis.
trying-to-find-the-right-channel-ly y'rs,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4