----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net> To: "Samuele Pedroni" <pedroni@inf.ethz.ch> Cc: <python-dev@python.org> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:20 AM Subject: RE: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type > [Samuele Pedroni] > >> And will improve doc tests doc readability <wink>. > > [Samuele Pedroni] > > Oops that should have been > > > >> And will improve doctest test docstrings readability <wink>. > > > > or doc tests readability <wink>. > > I don't think David uses doctest in that way -- to my surprise, *most* > doctest users don't seem to write documentation at all <wink>. s/docteset users/programmers/ ? I actually do write lots of documentation, and often use small doctest-compatible illustrations, but the problem with that is usually that a really comprehensive test is too big to make a readable comment. These days I don't get to write too much actual Python, so mostly I use doctest to exercise and verify extension modules built with Boost.Python. -Dave
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4