Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > Great! I have one reservation, but maybe I should be talked out of > it: I don't recall seeing patches submitted to SF by either of these. > Maybe we need to give them a trial period where they submit their work > to SF first? I think *anybody* should submit patches to SF first unless you are 100% sure that the patch fixes the problem in an undebatable way, and perhaps unless it is you. Being able to say "this is fine, please check it in (replacing the C++ style comment with a C style comment)" already helps reducing the load on the reviewer. Unless the new contributors are very careful, I'm sure they will break the CVS sooner or later. Unless this happens a week before the 2.3 release, I have no problem with that. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4