Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020840.html below:

[Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Yet another (?) for-with-indices
• Next message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> 
> > Damn, you're right.  I'll patch doctest to special-case the snot out of
> > those specific strings <wink>.  In the meantime,
> > 
> > def ibool(e):
> >     return e and 1 or 0
> >     # or "return operator.truth(e)"
> > 
> > will work across all Pythons forever, or back to 1.4 if you use
> > operator.truth to avoid offending yourself <wink>.

Btw given that probably operator.truth() will
become a synonym of bool() the "# or" comment
does not apply.

Tim, should we start to be worried about the problems you have
to get those things right or are you just in very-low-concetration mode?

regards, Samuele Pedroni.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Yet another (?) for-with-indices
• Next message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4