On 9 Mar 2002 at 18:44, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > So far you've been carrying this particular > > argument all by yourself. > > I was also the only one that had objections when > nested scopes were first proposed by Jeremy on this > list... I'm sure others will chime in once you have > checked in > an implementation. It hasn't helped that the argument has contained a whole lot of red herrings. Personally, I think repr(True) should return 1 and str(True) should return "True" (in line with str being the "friendly" and repr the "techy" representations). If there were any proposal for and / or to return booleans, I'd scream bloody murder, but in my own code, I don't forsee much breakage otherwise. -- Gordon http://www.mcmillan-inc.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4