Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I don't have a problem with either Jeff or Bernie being granted developer > > privileges. Feel free to add your two cents. > > Great! I have one reservation, but maybe I should be talked out of > it: I don't recall seeing patches submitted to SF by either of these. > Maybe we need to give them a trial period where they submit their work > to SF first? Soon enough we'll see if they're worth giving commit > privileges based upon the volume of their output. > > Or am I being too conservative? It could be that the chore of > uploading to SF is enough of a deterrent to make these good folks > unproductive... Chicken or egg, really. Should we just go for it? I've recently gone through the process as a new initiate. I don't think it is too burdensome to upload patches to SF, although SF is a PITA (especially recently). The breaking-in period is a good introduction and provides important feedback in the early stages of getting to know the code. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4