[Skip Montanaro] > I'm kinda curious. I understand all the arguments, but they've > been around for a long time. It's not like any of the reasons for > having a boolean are new. What straw broke your pet camel's back and > made you sit down and say to yourself, "We need a boolean type in > Python. I think I'll write a PEP today instead of going to Starbucks > for a latte."? It's obvious to me. I sent a "PEP Parade" message last night, stating in part that Guido wanted to keep new features out of the core for 2.3. Guido simply couldn't let a chance to prove me wrong slip by; indeed, that was my intent in making the claim to begin with <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4