A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020773.html below:

PEP 285 again -- correction?

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285 again -- correction? [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285 again -- correction?Hans Nowak wurmy@earthlink.net
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:15:58 -0500
Hum, as usual, I wasn't thinking...

if bool is a subclass of int, then we should still be able to add booleans to 
ints, right? In that case, that code would not break.

I was thinking of a strict Pascal-ish boolean. (You can imagine I was worried. 
;-)

<slaps forehead>

I'll crawl back in my shell now, where I belong... :-(

--Hans Nowak (vaporeon@wanadoo.nl)
http://www.awaretek.com/nowak/



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4