> > Do you propose to change the type of "x == y" et. al. from int --> bool? > > Yup. > > > Sounds good to me. > > I know. :-) > > > In general, I can change my doctests to use assert rather than looking > > for 1 or 0. > > Hm, assert is the wrong thing though, since it's optimized away in -O > mode. You may have to create your own function "check(x)" that does > nothing on true but raises an exception on false, or prints "Yes" or > "No", or something like that. Ick. Not that I run my doctests in -0 mode, though.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4