On 06 March 2002, Raymond Hettinger said:
> Before I send generator comprehension portion to Guido for
> pronouncement, I would like to get all of your votes +1 or -1 on just
> the part about Generator Comprehensions.
Well, since the proposal is four orthogonal ideas, may I vote multiple
times? Here goes...
-1 on new x{map,filter,...} builtins -- feels like too much at once
+0 on a new module to provide x{map,filter,...}
+0.5 on indexed() as a builtin
+1 on generator comprehensions; I favour the brackets
-0 on generater parameter passing, -1 on the particular syntax chosen
-0 on generater exception passing, -1 on using "throw"
(My last two votes are mostly because I haven't used generators very
much and don't really understand either the problem or the proposed
solution. So yes, I am ignorant. But I can spot ugly syntax/spelling
when I see it.)
Greg
--
Greg Ward - programmer-at-large gward@python.net
http://starship.python.net/~gward/
Vote anarchist.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4