>>>>> "JH" == Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@zope.com> writes:
JH> I'm puzzled by this vote. I did not know that people took
JH> random votes of Python developers in advance of a PEP. To
JH> paraphrase the IETF: I don't believe in votes, just rough
JH> consensus and running code.
It's like "Who's Line Is It Anyway?"; the points don't matter. :)
JH> If we are going to vote, please keep in mind the intended
JH> meaning of votes:
| +1, I endorse
| 0, I don't endorse
| -1, I veto; this proposal will get in over my dead body
Actually, it's +1, +0, -0, -1, with the sign of the 0 "vote" giving
the direction of your lean on the non-endorsement.
BTW, does anybody have a reference to where this voting system
originated or where it's been spelled out elegantly? I want to write
a short informatinal PEP on it for posterity. I vaguely remember it
started in the Apache world and Greg Stein transported it here.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4