On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:38:56 -0600 "Jason Orendorff" <jason@jorendorff.com> wrote: > > Before I send generator comprehension portion to Guido > for > > pronouncement, I would like to get all of your votes +1 > or -1 > > on just the part about Generator Comprehensions. > > -1 but not for a Good Reason - it just doesn't grab > me. I'm puzzled by this vote. I did not know that people took random votes of Python developers in advance of a PEP. To paraphrase the IETF: I don't believe in votes, just rough consensus and running code. If we are going to vote, please keep in mind the intended meaning of votes: +1, I endorse 0, I don't endorse -1, I veto; this proposal will get in over my dead body Don't veto unless you feel strongly. If you veto lots of things, Guido might end up ignoring your vetos <wink>. don't-think-you-can-veto-a-PDFL-pronouncement-ly y'rs, Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4