A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020679.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving bugs and patches through the pipeline more quickly

[Python-Dev] Moving bugs and patches through the pipeline more quicklySkip Montanaro skip@pobox.com
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:51:01 -0600
    Guido> [Skip]
    >> ... formal triage system ...

    Guido> Sorry, since we're all volunteers here, I don't see how a formal
    Guido> rotation could work.  Since you're a volunteer, I don't feel
    Guido> comfortable to tell you to do something.  

I wasn't thinking about it quite like that.  I was thinking more along the
lines of a subset of people would volunteer to do the triage, passing it off
between themselves at the rotation boundaries.  That's more-or-less how
Cameron Laird does it for the weekly Python URL stuff.

    >> As an "official" developer, I would find it useful to get a summary
    >> mailing weekly of stuff that's assigned to me.  I have no particular
    >> other reason to login to SF.

    Guido> When something's assigned to you, you get an email.  Isn't that
    Guido> enough?

Well, like most people, I need occasional re-reminding. ;-)

    >> This suggests that it would be useful if SF allowed people to
    >> temporarily inactivate themselves.  Is there such a feature?  (I
    >> didn't see anything, though I was just able to change my timezone
    >> from US/Eastern to US/Central.  woo hoo!)

    Guido> There's no such a thing.  I suppose you could remove yourself
    Guido> from the list of developers, and later when you want back on, you
    Guido> can ask to be added back.  But that only works for long absences
    Guido> (like several months).

Yeah, I was afraid of that.

    Guido> Playing games with the bug priority to get someone's
    Guido> attention is also the wrong thing to do ...

    >> I don't believe I suggested this as a way to grab peoples' attention.

    Guido> No, but Jonathan Gardner did that, and really p*ssed me off (he
    Guido> was complaining he didn't get a response to a bug he reported the
    Guido> previous evening).

I wasn't aware of that.  He obviously didn't raise the priority of a bug
that was assigned to me...

    Guido> I would certainly like to see more applications from people
    Guido> interested in getting developer status, even if it means I'll
    Guido> have to do semi-formal "interviews" or reference checks myself.
    Guido> How can we encourage the good developers that exist to help?

I suggest you post an announcement to c.l.py.  I don't know where best to
have them reply.  Sending mail to guido@python.org would clearly not be the
right place.  Python-dev wouldn't normally be the right place for this
either, but that's where all the people qualified to do the reference checks
hang out.

    >> Still, I sort of doubt this is how other large open source projects
    >> work.  I can't imagine it's a real productive use of your time or
    >> that of other gifted folks (Larry Wall, Ben Wing, etc).

    Guido> I'll do anything I can to get more people to volunteer.  

Do you think if the PSF sold a Guido swimsuit calendar it would help?  ;-)

be-careful-when-you-say-"anything"-ly, y'rs,

Skip



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4