> Hope you don't mind ;-) ... Not at all, we're hoping to arrive at something usable and fun for all! > You should name the type timestamp if you want to imply dt + n > == dt + n seconds. datetime + n is commonly understood as > dt + n *days*. Hm, I hadn't thought of that. To me seconds are the only thing that makes sense because that's what a Unix timestamp does, but I haven't read or written a lot of commercial code using date/time data. Is this just an mxDateTime convention, or is it in wider use? (URLs of docs of other languages / libraries would really help to convince me!) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4