A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020588.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: [Psyco-devel] Re: [Zope-Coders] Psyco release 0.4.0

[Python-Dev] Re: [Psyco-devel] Re: [Zope-Coders] Psyco release 0.4.0 [Python-Dev] Re: [Psyco-devel] Re: [Zope-Coders] Psyco release 0.4.0Petru Paler ppetru@ppetru.net
01 Mar 2002 22:42:00 +0200
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 18:56, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Just run ab against a Zope 2.5.0 instance and tested
> the performance against a stupid PythonScript.
> 
> Results:
> 
> without psyco:   116 requests/second
> with    psyco:    33 requests/second
> 
> Jup, Zope is about 3.5 times slower *with* psyco.
> Any explanations for this worse behaviour ?

Just a wild, wild guess: this could be related to Psyco not doing the
regular interval polling, so PyThreadState_Swap() doesn't get called as
often as it should, ZServer piles up requests, the worker threads get
starved, and so on.

-- 
Petru Paler, http://www.ppetru.net






RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4