----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Hettinger" <python@rcn.com>
To: <python-dev@python.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Dict constructor
> From: "Tim Peters" <tim@zope.com>
> > -1 because of ambiguity. Is this trying to build a set with the single
> > element (42, 666), or a mapping of 42 to 666?
> >
> > dict([(42, 666)]}
>
> I've been thinking about this and the unabiguous explicit solution is to
> specify a value argument like dict.get().
>
> >>> dict([(42, 666)]) # current behavior unchanged
> {42: 666}
>
> >>> dict([(42, 666)], True)
> {(42, 666): True}
>
> >>> dict( '0123456789abcdef', True)
> {'a': True, 'c': True, 'b': True, 'e': True, 'd': True, 'f': True, '1':
> True, '0': True, '3': True, '2': True, '5': True, '4': True, 7': True,
'6':
> True, '9': True, '8': True}
>
> >>> dict('0123456789abcdef') # current behavior unchanged
> ValueError: dictionary update sequence element #0 has length 1; 2 is
> required
>
>
>
> The goal is not to provide full set behavior but to facilitate the common
> task of building dictionaries with a constant value. It comes up in
> membership testing and in uniquifying sequences. The task of dict() is to
> construct dictionaries and this is a reasonably common construction.
>
But is it really common enough to merit special-casing what can anyway be
spelt very simply:
adict = {}
for k in asequence:
dict[k] = sentinel
?
regards
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/
Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4