jack wrote:
> I disagree on this being "magical", I tend to think of it as
> "Pythonic". If there is a reasonably easy to remember construct
> (such as this one: if you've seen it once you'll remember it)
> just use that, in stead of adding extra layers of functionality.
to quote a certain bot (guess raymond wasn't following that
thread):
"It's easier to write appropriate code from scratch in Python
than to figure out how to *use* a package profligate enough
to contain canned solutions for all common and reasonable
use cases."
time to add a best_practices module to Python 2.3?
KeyError:-profligate-ly yrs /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4