Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-June/025887.html below:

[Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try

• Previous message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Next message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    SM> I would prefer the old version be moved to lib-old (or
    SM> Modules-old?).  For people still running DB 2.x it shouldn't be a
    SM> major headache to retrieve.

    BAW> Modules/old/ probably.  We wouldn't do anything with that directory
    BAW> except use it as a placeholder for old extension source, right?

Sounds good to me.

    BAW> Do we care about preserving the cvs history for the current
    BAW> bsddbmodule.c?  If so, we'll have to ask SF to do a cvs dance for
    BAW> us.  It may not be worth it.

I think it would be worthwhile.  Alternatively, you could cvs remove it, the
add it to Modules/old with a note to check the Attic for older revision
notes.

Skip

• Previous message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Next message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4