Christian Tismer wrote: > >... > > Ok, I'm all with it. > Since a couple of hours, I'm riding the following horse: > > - $name, $(name), $(any expr) is just fine > - all of this is compile-time stuff > .... I think you just described PEP 215. But what you're missing is that we need a compile time facility for its flexibility and simplicity but we also need a runtime facility to allow I18N. > I also believe it is a good idea to do the _() on > the unexpanded string (as shown), since the submitted > values are most probably hard to translate at all. _ runs at runtime. If the interpolation is done at compile time then "_" is executed too late. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4