>>>>> "FP" =3D=3D Fran=E7ois Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
FP> Saying that PEP 292 rejects an idea because this idea would
FP> require another PEP to be debated and accepted beforehand, and
FP> than rushing the acceptance of PEP 292 as it stands, is
FP> probably missing the point of the discussion.
I don't think there's /any/ danger of rushing acceptance of PEP 292.
It may not even be accepted at all.
still-slogging-through-50-some-odd-messages-ly y'rs,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4