Oren Tirosh wrote: > >... > No need for double backslash. No need for a special string prefix either > because \( currently has no meaning. I like this idea but note that \( does have a current meaning: >>> "\(" '\\(' >>> "\(" =="\\(" 1 I think this is weird but it is inherited from C... So it would take time to phase this in. First we have to warn about \( and then give people time to find instances of it and change them to \\(. Then we could introduce a new meaning for it. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4