I'm about a pure 0 on this proposal in the aggregate
I'm -1 on .sub() as the name; I'd rather it be called .interp() (this
mainly due to confusing with the existing re.sub() and str.replace())
I'm +0 on putting this functionality in the text module instead of
adding a string method
I'm +0 on trying to find a solution that uses % instead of $ (There's
Only One Way)
I'm -1 on ${name}; there's no reason not to at least use $(name) for
consistency
--
Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
Project Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4