On Thu, Jun 20, 2002, François Pinard wrote: > [Barry A. Warsaw] >> >> In any event, allvars() or a-different-vars() is out of scope for this >> PEP. We'd use it if it was there, but I think it needs its own PEP, >> which someone else will have to champion. > > On the other hand, the allvars() suggestion is right on the point > in my opinion. It is not a stand-alone suggestion, its goal was to > stress out that `.sub()' is too far from the `%' operator, it looks > like a random addition. The available formatting paradigms of Python, > I mean, those which are standard, should look a bit more unified, > just to preserve overall elegance. If we want Python to stay elegant > (which is the source of comfort and pleasure, these being the main > goals of using Python after all), we have to seek elegance in each > Python move. +1 -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Project Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4