A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-June/025688.html below:

[Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try

[pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a tryMartin v. Loewis martin@v.loewis.de
20 Jun 2002 09:42:27 +0200
"Gregory P. Smith" <greg@electricrain.com> writes:

> Modern berkeleydb uses much different on disk database formats, glancing
> at the docs on sleepycat.com i don't even think it can read bsddb (1.85)
> files.  Existing code using bsddb (1.85) should not automatically start
> using a different database library even if we provide a compatibility
> interface.  

The Python bsddb module never guaranteed that you can use it to read
bsddb 1.85 data files. In fact, on many installation, the bsddb module
links with bsddb 2.x or bsddb 3.x, using db_185.h.

So this is no reason not to call the module bsddb.

Regards,
Martin




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4