BAW> I still think we may want to pull PyBSDDB into the standard distro,
BAW> as a way to provide BDB api's > 1.85. The question is, what would
BAW> this new module be called? I dislike "bsddb3" -- which I think
BAW> PyBSDDB itself uses -- because it links against BDB 4.0.
Guido> Good idea. Maybe call it berkeleydb? That's what Sleepycat
Guido> calls it (there's no connection with the BSD Unix distribution
Guido> AFAICT).
Why can't it just be called bsddb? As far as I could tell tell, it provides
a bsddb-compatible interface at the module level. The only change at the
bsddb level is the addition of an extra object (db? I can't recall right
now and have to get offline soon for the credit card machine so I can't
pause to check ;-) which gives the programmer access to all the PyBSDDB
magic.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4