"Gregory P. Smith" <greg@electricrain.com> writes: > If I hadn't made the initial mistake of naming pybsddb's module bsddb3 > when i first extended robin's berkeleydb 2.x module to work with 3.0 I > would agree with that name. I worry that having a module named bsddb2 > might cause endless confusion as bsddb and bsddb3 already exist and did > correlate to the version number. How about 'berkeleydb'? What does it have to do with the city of Berkeley (CA)? Perhaps "sleepycat"? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4