> Below is the output of test_socket with the -v option, from a CVS tree of
> about 1915 UTC June 18. FreeBSD 4.4, gcc 2.95.3 (-g -O3).
>
> In speaking up now, I'm making the assumption that the non-blocking socket
> changes should be complete, modulo bugfixes. If this is not the case,
> please let me know, and I'll wait for the situation to stabilise.
This is supposed to work, there's a missing feature but it's not being
tested yet. :-)
> Otherwise, is there any more info I can (attempt to) provide? I tried
> "print"ing the addr variable when running the test, and just get "ERROR"
> (sans quotes of course).
Try
print "\n" + repr(addr)
There are probably some differences in the socket semantics. I'd
appreciate it if you could provide a patch or at least a clue!
(I'll be away from Friday through July 8.)
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4