On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:30:11AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > barry@zope.com (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > > > I still think we may want to pull PyBSDDB into the standard distro, as > > a way to provide BDB api's > 1.85. The question is, what would this > > new module be called? I dislike "bsddb3" -- which I think PyBSDDB > > itself uses -- because it links against BDB 4.0. > > If this is just a question of naming, I recommend bsddb2 - not > indicating the version of the database, but the version of the Python > module. If I hadn't made the initial mistake of naming pybsddb's module bsddb3 when i first extended robin's berkeleydb 2.x module to work with 3.0 I would agree with that name. I worry that having a module named bsddb2 might cause endless confusion as bsddb and bsddb3 already exist and did correlate to the version number. How about 'berkeleydb'?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4