On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 10:34:24AM +0100, Duncan Booth wrote:
>What I really don't understand is why there is such pressure to get an
>alternative interpolation added as methods to str & unicode rather than
>just adding an interpolation module to the library?
It could live in the new text module, where Greg Ward's word-wrapping
code will be going. +1 on /F's suggestion of recycling the
os.path.expandvars() code.
(Maybe a syntax-checker for %(...) strings would solve Mailman's
problems, and alleviate the plaintive cries for an alternative
interpolation syntax?)
--amk (www.amk.ca)
GERTRUDE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
-- _Hamlet_, III, ii
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4