Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-June/025566.html below:

[Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Next message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

barry@zope.com (Barry A. Warsaw) writes:

> I still think we may want to pull PyBSDDB into the standard distro, as
> a way to provide BDB api's > 1.85.  The question is, what would this
> new module be called?  I dislike "bsddb3" -- which I think PyBSDDB
> itself uses -- because it links against BDB 4.0.

If this is just a question of naming, I recommend bsddb2 - not
indicating the version of the database, but the version of the Python
module.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Next message: [pybsddb] Re: [Python-Dev] Please give this patch for building bsddb a try
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4