jeremy@zope.com (Jeremy Hylton) writes: > We sure don't provide much help for such an administrator. We do, but not in 2.1. > os.path.exists() is perhaps the most egregious. I think it's worth > backporting the fix to the 2.1 branch, along with any other glaring > errors. We might still see a 2.1.4. In that case, I recommend to backport the machinery that enables LFS from 2.2. If this machinery fails to detect LFS support on a system, there is a good chance that your processing of EOVERFLOW fails on that system as well. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4