A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-June/025467.html below:

[Python-Dev] addressing distutils inability to track file dependencies

[Python-Dev] addressing distutils inability to track file dependenciesGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:47:38 -0400
> Here's a rough strategy for exploiting this feature in distutils.
> Does it make sense?  Happily, I can't see any possible use of make.
> 
> There is an option to enable dependency tracking.  Not sure how the
> option is passed: command line (tedious), setup (not easily customized
> by user), does distutils have a user options file of some sort?

We could make the configure script check for GCC, and if detected, add
-MD to it.

> Each time distutils compiles a file it passes the -MD file to generate
> a .d file.
> 
> On subsequent compilations, it checks for the .d file.  If the .d file
> does not exist or is older than the .c file, it recompiles.
> Otherwise, it parses the .d file and compares the times for each of
> the dependencies.

Sounds good.  It could skip parsing the .d file if the .o file
doesn't exist or is older than the .c file.  If there is no .d file, I
would suggest only recompiling if the .c file is newer than the .o
file (otherwise systems without GCC will see recompilation of
everything all the time -- not a good idea IMO.)

Go ahead and implement this!

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4